I should clarify, though, that my reference to Jew as a race, and Jew as a religion is not separated in what I wrote, but I acknowledge the difference.

But when I'm referencing those who occupied that land some 2500 years ago, I'm speaking about the race.

A non-racial "Jew" who is merely a convert thereafter, actually has no claim to that territory, in my opinion.

This is 2021 and we shouldn't be supporting religious states in that manner.

It's one thing to argue that Jews are entitled to it because they once lived there (which comes with its own flawed logic), but it's something else entirely to believe that a group of religious people are owed rights to that land, or even a land of their own.

Imagine Christians taking over an area, saying they deserve it because the Bible said so.

I can't square that logic either, for the record.

I figured I should clarify the difference and lack thereof within what I responded to you with.